|
|
Proposed Law Would Crack Down On Drivers Stoned Behind
URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v04/n673/a01.html
Newshawk: Herb
Pubdate: Fri, 30 Apr 2004
Source: Mississauga News (CN ON)
Copyright: The Mississauga News 2004
Contact: thenews@mississauga.net
Website: http://www.mississauganews.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/268
Author: Louie Rosella
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?224
(Cannabis and Driving)
PROPOSED LAW WOULD CRACK DOWN ON DRIVERS STONED
BEHIND WHEEL
Mississauga motorists who toke and drive will no longer walk away clean
under a proposed plan that gives Peel Regional Police the power to
demand saliva, blood and urine from drivers whom they suspect are high
on drugs.
The proposed changes to the Criminal Code, introduced this week by the
federal Liberals, are being welcomed by Peel traffic officers and
officials with Mississauga-based Mothers Against Drunk Driving ( MADD ).
"We are very pleased that the government is finally
listening," said Andrew Murie, MADD's national executive director.
"Police simply have no powers to send the message out that drugs
and driving don't mix."
Although it's a criminal offence to drive while impaired on drugs or
alcohol -- with penalties running to life imprisonment in the case where
the offence causes a death -- the police don't have the authority to
test a driver for drugs and obtain evidence for a prosecution.
While there is a standard procedure to administer a breathalyzer when
drinking and driving is suspected, it's much harder for police to prove
a driver is impaired by drug use.
Currently, there are just a handful of drug-related impaired driving
cases before the courts in Peel, police said.
Peel police say they have been forced to let suspected impaired drivers
go, even when they appear to be high on drugs, because police weren't
empowered to collect enough proof of impairment.
"The laws are limited as to what we can do ( when police suspect
impairment through drugs )," said Peel Inspector Norm English, head
of Traffic Services. "Any assistance that could help us deal
with it or eliminate it is beneficial."
Under the new bill, a police officer could, on reasonable suspicion that
a driver is drug-impaired, require a road-side physical sobriety test.
If a driver fails, the officer at the scene could demand more extensive
testing at the police station by an officer specially trained in drug
recognition ( DRE ).
The DRE officer would demand a sample of a bodily fluid for testing.
Failure to provide a sample on demand would be a criminal offence -- a
fine of $600 for the first offence.
Murie said MADD and police are grateful the legislation is being
introduced at the same time the government is expected to pass a
controversial bill to decriminalize possession of small amounts of
marijuana.
|
|