|
|
UCSC Sociologist Says Making Pot Legal Does Not Boost Use
URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v04/n674/a02.html
Newshawk: JimmyG
Pubdate: Tue, 04 May 2004
Source: Santa Cruz Sentinel (CA)
Copyright: 2004 Santa Cruz Sentinel
Contact: editorial@santa-cruz.com
Website: http://www.santacruzsentinel.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/394
Author: Anna Gosline
Cited: National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws
http://www.norml.org
Referenced: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v04/n671/a09.html
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?420
(Cannabis - Popular)
UCSC SOCIOLOGIST SAYS MAKING POT LEGAL DOES NOT BOOST
USE
SANTA CRUZ -- A leading critic of U.S. drug policy contends there
is no link between the decriminalization of marijuana and increased drug
use.
In research published in the May issue of the American Journal of Public
Health, Craig Reinarman, a UC Santa Cruz sociologist, said he found
there was no difference between drug-use rates in Amsterdam, where
marijuana is freely bought at licensed coffee shops, and San Francisco,
where pot-smokers still can get busted.
"Drug policy doesn't appear to have much relevance," Reinarman
said in an interview Monday. "There is not a lot of evidence
to suggest that criminalization has a deterrent effect."
In the late 1990s, Reinarman conducted random door-to-door surveys of
265 adults from San Francisco who had used marijuana 25 times or more.
The research team, including two scientists from the Center for Drug
Research in the Netherlands, then compared the data with identical
survey information gathered from 216 adults in Amsterdam.
The results showed no difference between the cities for key factors such
as age of first use, and age and duration of maximum use. Dutch
marijuana users also were less likely to use other illicit drugs such as
cocaine, crack, amphetamines or opiates such as heroin.
"It seems to us that the burden of proof is now on those that
support criminalization to prove that it actually reduces drug
use," said Reinarman, who won a lifetime achievement award from the
Drug Policy Foundation in 1999.
Paul Armentano, a senior policy analyst at the National Organization for
the Reform of Marijuana Laws, said he isn't surprised by Reinarman's
results.
"The results ( from similar studies ) have been remarkably
consistent, whether the study comes from university researchers or the
government," he said. "Marijuana use ebbs and flows
regardless of marijuana penalties. That's the case in this country
and frankly, in countries all over the world. I'd like to think
that if the drug policies were based on science, they would
change."
But others on the front lines of the war on drugs, like Richard Westphal,
commander of the Santa Cruz County Narcotics Enforcement Team, remain
opposed to decriminalization.
"There would be increased usage and more people will try it,"
he said, arguing against decriminalization. Westphal believes
criminal punishment does prevent people from using the drug excessively.
Rhonda Jones at Janus of Santa Cruz, a drug treatment center, agreed:
"We believe that pot is a gateway drug. If a person smokes a
lot of pot, they will likely try something stronger."
Jones also said addicts recovering from harder drugs such as cocaine or
heroin will sometimes pick up marijuana, then slide back into their old
habits.
Robert MacCoun, a sociologist at UC Berkeley, also has studied marijuana
usage in the United States and the Netherlands. He said he saw a
rise in marijuana use in the mid-1980s when legal marijuana sellers
launched aggressive advertising campaigns. The Netherlands has
since restricted these campaigns.
"We think that commercialization has the potential to significantly
increase marijuana usage," he said, "but decriminalization
poses very little risk.
"What we really need to understand is why countries like Sweden,
who have restrictive drug policies similar to the U.S., also have low
levels of drug use."
|
|